Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Griffin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Griffin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notablity requirements outlined in WP:NACTOR. Minor roles and/or non-notable films/shows. No substantial independent coverage. Peacock (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails the multiple significant roles in notable productions test.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Searching is made more difficult because of athers with the same name. Her best bet for NACTOR may be from stage shows. Such as Piranha Heights (review not positive for her). But I couldn't find enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.